Monica Roccaforte Polka Yellow Movie

world university rankings NOBEL PRIZE FOR

WORLD UNIVERSITIES RANKING


SIR Ranking Iberoamericano 2010



Complete information see:


http://www.unmsm.edu.pe/occaa/publicaciones/ranking_iberoamericano_2010.pdf



Introduction


SIR The Latin American Ranking 2010 is presented as a tool of analysis and evaluation of research activities of the Institutions of Higher Education in Latin America. The report, prepared as a set of rankings, shows organized information about research activities conducted in the period 2003-2008. The indicators have been selected to provide relevant information to policy makers and resource managers scientific research and in order to highlight some of the most important dimensions that characterize research activity.


The ultimate goal of this paper is to provide analysis and assessment tool in two ways. On the one hand aims to provide an overview, helping policy makers to glimpsed as fit the research results at the institutional level to the objectives outlined in the plans, programs and science policy at both institutional and national level as primarily within the American context. On the other hand, from a specific point of view, providing an institutional managers benchmarking tool to assess the adequacy of the results research with the resources, the priorities and challenges.


Methodology


SIR The Latin American Ranking 2010 presents a detailed profile based on quantitative data on publication and citation to analyze research of all Latin American institutions of higher education. For its preparation have been analyzed scientific publications included in the Scopus citation index produced by Elsevier. Scopus is the largest scientific database in the world with more than 20,000 scientific publications, including more than 17,000 journals "per review, books and conference proceedings.

The ranking includes all Latin American universities that have produced some scientific communication in 2008. For these institutions are analyzed for publication and citation data for the period 2003-2008. Data on the production correspond to those items that include some direction belonging to each of the institutions. For the citation-based data have been analyzed all publications in the world for the period specified.


General Analysis


The ranking includes the 607 Latin American universities have published a document contained in Scopus in 2008. A total of 28 countries that include at least one institution in the ranking with a very uneven distribution, where Spain, Brazil and Colombia account for about 50% of the total.

NOTE: Of the 600 UNIVERSITI ES IN LATIN AMERICA, Cayetano Heredia University is number N ª 135 AND OVER NATIONAL UNIVERSITY IN SAN MARCOS No. 189.

2006 Ranking of Latin American universities

Universities in Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Chile in Latin America by emphasizing its scientific production through scientific invetigación.

These same Latin American country, no other more-appear in the ranking of the top 500 world universities published by the University of Shanghai People's Republic of China.

One of the most important criteria for evaluating the quality of a university's scientific output. This means that university who have qualified for the work of Scientific Research as a priority and are universities that produce science, technology and innovation.

Posted by UDDES - University, Democracy and Development on 12/11/2008

12.000 Web Ranking of World Universities

http:// www.webometrics.info / index_en.html (accessed 02/12/1910)

1. Harvard University

2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

3. University of California Berkeley

4. Cornell University

70. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

122. Universidade de São Paulo

502.Universidad de Concepción (Chile)

648

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

629 Catholic University (Peru)

932

National University Mayor de San Marcos

2085 UNI 2149

UNLM

2310 UPSMP

2422 UPRP

UPCH

2500 2698

UPCAplicadas

UP 2892

of 100 American universities is the first UNAM, upcp 18, 37 is UNMSM. Nothing more.

In the following source: http://www.universite.cl/ranking_mundial_de_universidades.html

(December December 2009)

of 10 leading universities in the world, 8 are U.S. and 02 in England

Stanford University

Harvard University

California-Berkeley

Cambridge University (England)

MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology

California Institute of Technology

In the following source:

http://mba.americaeconomia.com/biblioteca/papers/el-ranking-mundial-de-universidades-la-situacion-de-america-latina-y-chile

AmericaEconomia magazine

III. OVERALL RESULTS OF THE RANKING

NA United States: provided, neither more nor less than 17 of the top 20 universities worldwide. Also, this country has accumulated 55% of the top 100 universities and 30% of the total 500. The U.S. predominance considering also shows that universities in the UK and Germany represent, in each case, 8% of the total 500, slightly ahead of Japan and China, which each have 6% of all universities included in the ranking. It is also noteworthy that the first French university in the ARWU appears only in the number 40 (Paris 6), and before she placed two other British universities, one from Switzerland and two in Canada. Also the first Italian university in the ranking appears in the group 100-150 (University of Milan), and the first English (University of Barcelona) is located in the group (152-200).

The clear dominance of the U.S. on the old continent, was the factor that led to the European Community to take a profound change in their university systems, which culminated in the so-called Bologna Program. This initiative has involved a radical change in the orientation and duration of undergraduate studies, a fundamental openness to student mobility between universities, and a strong impetus to graduate. To be seen that these changes could actually reverse a situation in which Europe is clearly a disadvantage globally but, as the ranking privileges the research results, at least for him the changes that occur can not produce a different situation.

IV. RESULTS OF MEXICO AND LATIN AMERICA

The participation of Latin American universities in the ranking is known globally irrelevant. Four countries in the region include the ranking since 2003: Argentina, Brazil., Chile and Mexico A total of 10 universities in the region was part of the ranking in 2009, constituting a meager 2% of the universe total. Of these ten universities six are Brazilian, two Chilean, an Argentina and Mexico. As shown in Table 1, the first university in the region of Sao Paulo is closely followed by the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). The first of these is ranked 156 in world rankings, while the second is to place 163. According to these results, the last university in the context of the participants is the University of Chile, which ranks 462

V. CONCLUSIONS

The presence of Latin American universities in the world ranking is extremely low. Most of them are between 300 and 500 levels, while U. State of Sao Paulo and the University of Chile are close to the value that would put them in the rankings published. There is a vital aspect that is concerned with improving the information available for the Institute Jiao Tong can properly weigh the reality of the Latin American system. On a more substantive nature, the Latin American university system seems increasingly geared towards undergraduate teaching, while spending on basic and applied research is maintained at extremely low levels. Indeed, since the ranking prepared by the Jiao Tong is a measurement that focuses primarily on research excellence, the trend will be reduced further Latin American participation in the universities of greater prominence in the world.

In the source:

http://www.articuloz.com/educacion-articulos/ranking-mundial-de-universidades-qf-3224242.html

is unfortunate American reality, even in Mexico and Central America that concerns us as Best of Latin America are: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM), University of São Paulo, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Universidad de Buenos Aires , Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Universidad Chile, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Tecnológico de Monterrey.

University of Shanghai World University Ranking

As every year, the Institute of Shanghai Higher Education publishes its ranking of the top 500 universities worldwide. Of these, only 11 are English, and none of them ranks among the top 100.

Shanghai

leaves the middle or lower part of the classification. The best rated are the University of Barcelona (since 152), the Autonomous University of Madrid, the Complutense and Valencia.

Within the European Cambridge is the best stop, even ahead of MIT and Yale. The elite university education is in America. 20 of the 25 best according to the study are located in the American giant (three in the UK and two in Japan. Few surprises on the podium: The best position in the rankings is Harvard, followed by Stanford and Berkeley.

In the source:

http://carmorvan.lacoctelera.net/post/2008/04/05/universidades-latinoamericanas-casi-figuran-el-ranking

The ranking of universities in the Web notes that among the first 20 universities in the world in this ranking, 19 are from the United States and England, at position 19.

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY

HARVARD UNIVERSITY

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

STANFORD UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS

URBANA CHAMPAIGN UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

CORNELL UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

MADISON UNIVE

RSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN

CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO

PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY NEW YORK

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

Latin American Ranking

UNIVERSITY NATIONAL AUTONOMA DE MEXICO

110 UNIVERSITY OF SAO PAULO

STATE UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS

UNIVERSITY OF CHILE

FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA

FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO

Tecnologico de Monterrey

UNIVERSITY OF BUENOS AIRES

FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL

FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS

PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO

PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF CHILE

UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA

STATE UNIVERSITY PAULISTA

UNIVERSITY OF GUADALAJARA

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LA PLATA

FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANA

FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA

UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCION

UNIVERSITY OF LOS ANDES MERIDA

In the source: http://www.unmsm.edu.pe/Noticias/enero/d21/veramp.php?val=1

The top schools and universities in Peru .

Manuel Burga, President

CU. 21/01/2004

Surfing the Internet you can find the Academic Ranking of World Universities 2003 prepared by the Institute of Higher Education of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, which after two years of research with a large sample of universities gives it to stakeholders. Have been evaluated based on five criteria: a) His Nobel prize; b) Its researchers highly above, c) Articles published in the journals Nature and Science; d) Articles in the "Science Citation Index-expanded" and the "Social Science Citation Index, and e) Academic performance of their teachers.

With some surprise we found that they do not consider the grades and qualifications of teachers, which to our law and statute University San Marcos are key to locate our teachers in the remuneration scale. Nor are we surprised to find Harvard first, Stanford second, third and Berkeley Caltech in fourth, all of them and many of the 10 American following. Accompanied, from the 5th. place, out-standing British universities como Cambridge y Oxford. La presencia de la universidad americana es simplemente abrumadora, no así la de la universidad francesa, italiana, alemana, japonesa, española o europea en general.

Luego he recorrido minuciosamente este Ranking en busca de universidades latinoamericanas y lo encontrado no es nada alentador. La UNAM de México ocupa el puesto 152. La Universidad Federal de Rio de Janeiro y la de Buenos Aires comparten el 301. La Estadual Campinas ocupa el 351 lugar, mientras que la Universidad de Chile el puesto 401. San Marcos, afortunadamente, gracias a la Red de Macrouniversidades de América Latina y el Caribe, mantiene estrechos lazos de colaboración e intercambio con estas cinco universidades, particularly with the UNAM and the U. de Chile. Furthermore, as strongly as we do in our journals, we have analyzed and discussed the importance of these two Latin American models of the imminent reform of the Peruvian university. All these 500 universities are institutions with enormous financial resources and sufficient to mention the trust of $ 18.500 million from Harvard or the budget of U.S. $ 1.500 million from the UNAM and the $ 220 million U. of Chile, the three very different and very unequal populations, although government regulations that ensure them intelligent and effective.

For our comfort we could say that only include universities in Mexico, Brazil, Argentina and Chile, and we're out but well accompanied by a large majority of Latin American countries. But this is a very poor consolation, since neither would be well placed in the next 500 ranked universities. So you have to really worry about the exclusion of an international outlook which should be already well positioned. It is therefore urgent that the Peruvian public and private universities should be reformed to achieve adequate levels of quality and academic performance.

all know that Peruvian higher education is not the best time in history and yet on Tuesday 13, to the surprise some, the proposal of the engineer Julio Dominguez, president of the University challenged Los Angeles de Chimbote, without seeking balances and hear proposals, 41 bodies, re-elected for the third time the engineer Francisco Delgado de la Flor as president of the NRA, in the hope perhaps very reasonably that FEDADOI 50 million should be allocated last year, in equal parts for the 30 public universities. This distribution, as well as the current budget allocation criteria used by the MEF, tend to flatten the Peruvian university system and disappear completely in the world rankings of universities.

In the source:

http://www.prensaperu.net/web/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=182% 3Alas-universities-most-powerful-in-the-world-is- the-de-more-prestigious & catid = 23% 3Aarticulos-research & Itemid = 12

UNIVERSITIES MORE POWERFUL IN THE WORLD ARE THE MOST PRESTIGIOUS.

By Dr Javier Flores Arocutipa

In the ranking of the University of Shanghai of 2008, Latinas have 10 universities, six are Brazilian, Both are Chilean one is Mexican and the last is Argentina. In this case there is still a Peruvian.

Consider the table:

LATINAS UNIVERSITIES IN WORLD UNIVERSITIES RANKING

RANKING 2008

1 Univ Sao Paulo Brazil

2 Univ Buenos Aires Argentina

Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico 3 Mexico

4 Univ Estadual Campinas Brazil

5 Univ Fed Minas Gerais

6 Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro Brazil

7 Pontifical Catholic Univ Chile

Chile Chile 8 Universidad

9 Univ Estadual Paulista Brazil

10 Univ Fed Rio Grande Sul Brazil

Source: University ARWU Shanghai.

BUT IT'S GOOD TO INDICATE THAT THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PERU FIGURE IN THE WORLD UNIVERSITIES RANKING OF THE - QS World University Rankings 2008 OF THE UNITED STATES.

This World Ranking 500 universities there are 13 Hispanic, five Brazil, three in Argentina, two Chileans, two Mexican and Peruvian. This turns out to be the University Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru. And of the 13 Latinas the best positioned in this ranking is the National Autonomous University of Mexico, ranked 150, while last year was ranked 192. A University of Sao Paulo has not fared well since the year 2007 was ranked 175 today is far from the first, is in the post 196.